Skip to main content

Cityscape: Volume 19 Number 3 | U.S. Commentary: Effects of Housing Subsidies on the Well-Being of Children and Their Families in the Family Options Study

HUD.GOV HUDUser.gov

The Family Options Study

Volume 19, Number 3

Editors
Mark D. Shroder
Michelle P. Matuga

U.S. Commentary: Effects of Housing Subsidies on the Well-Being of Children and Their Families in the Family Options Study

Aletha C. Huston
University of Texas at Austin


Homelessness and housing instability are bad for children and families—a fact that is obvious to any reasonable individual but is also well documented by social science research. Children who are homeless or who move often have poorer school achievement and more behavioral problems than comparably poor children who live in more stable housing situations (Buckner, 2008; Mehana and Reynolds, 2004). Public policy solutions for these problems are less obvious, but the Family Options Study provides some clear guidance about what does and does not work. In the Family Options Study (Gubits et al., 2016), the effects of four types of policy interventions on homeless families with children were compared in a random assignment design. Families were followed for 3 years after the interventions were introduced.


Previous Article   |   Next Article

 

image of city buildings