Skip to main content

Cityscape: Volume 20 Number 2 | The Housing-Health Connection

HUD.GOV HUDUser.gov

The Housing-Health Connection

Volume 20, Number 2

Editors
Mark D. Shroder
Michelle P. Matuga

A Pilot Community Health Worker Program in Subsidized Housing: The Health + Housing Project

Amy L. Freeman
Tianying Li
Sue A. Kaplan
New York University School of Medicine

Ingrid Gould Ellen
New York University

Ashley Young
Diane Rubin
Henry Street Settlement

Marc N. Gourevitch
Kelly M. Doran
New York University School of Medicine


  • Objectives: We examine the implementation of a community health worker (CHW) program in subsidized housing, describe needs identified and priorities set by residents, and summarize participant-reported outcomes.
  • Methods: Partnering with a local community-based organization, four bilingual CHWs recruited adult residents in one public housing building and one Section 8 building to participate in a 15-month intervention. Residents set health-related and life-improvement goals and developed an action plan for achieving them. CHWs used a motivational interviewing framework to help residents achieve their goals and connect them to case management, healthcare services, and other community resources. Prior to the intervention, surveyors approached every unit in both buildings for a baseline survey; 390 of an estimated 819 residents responded (47.6 percent). Of the 226 who completed an intake assessment with a CHW, 149 completed the program assessment questionnaire (65.9 percent).
  • Results: Residents reported high levels of chronic disease, mental health issues, and low satisfaction with social relationships. 226 residents (61.3 percent female, 29.7 percent age 65 years or older, and 68.6 percent Hispanic or Latino) completed an intake assessment with a CHW and received an average of 11 in-person visits. Most program assessment respondents reported partially or completely achieving their most important goal (82.0 percent). They also reported high levels of satisfaction with the CHW program (96.6 percent) and improved overall well-being (78.6 percent).
  • Conclusions: CHWs based in subsidized housing buildings encountered high levels of medical and social needs among residents. Improvements in self-reported well-being and high levels of satisfaction with the program suggest that such place-based initiatives may be effective in addressing health and its determinants.


Previous Article   |   Next Article

 

image of city buildings